Congratulations Rel!
I was NOT able to break DiSEqC Committed/Uncommitted switching in the tests I performed in my normal input environment(s), Çok tesekkür ederim...
==
W2KP, p4-2.4GHz
===
Verified correct:
ss2-rev2.3p, MIBI patched 4.40
th1020a red (03t), v2.4.1.1.
genpix, v1.2.1
===
Will test th1020 green, bl2030 and others when I can free up one of my dual processor machines this weekend.
==
We need to get you at least one Spaun 420 to test with.
What else do you need i.e. cards.
Stabs in the dark are beneath you.
oh, heh, the things I lack while testing are a Dishpro LNB (impossible to find in Europe), an uncommitted switch (not sure about Europe but none of the sat shops in Turkey sells them)
PS: If you don't use a committed swtich (cascaded with an uncommitted switch), just select "None" as Diseqc Type and specify the port of uncommitted swtich on the satellite selection dialog.
I dont have time to struggle with the complexity of the graphical support of uncommitted switches in diseqc tree at the mooent.
==
I am very proud of you for the commitment to correct the DiSEqC/Scanning opportunites. Well done.
The Spaun SUR-420's are readily available to you for around 65 euros for the WSG version (weather proof outside housing), Germany/UK for sure. Worth twice as much for their reliability/functionality. I'm currently at 10 and about to add more... it's just money!
Contact me privately if you REALLY need stacked lnb(f)'s and no one else steps forward to assist. There are several types, I use strictly c-120 mount equipment. The DN versions require a little knowledge about waveguides to implement on non-disnetwork equipment.
The graphical support you have for uncommitted is functional, corrected subserviency is iceing on the cake. I know correction will be fairly major. I'll post an additional feature request for an interim aide that may preclude the major changes.
====
NoOne1